Health, Vaping

A study organised by teenagers illuminates the widespread vaping culture and looks for intervention strategies.

New research presents a disconcerting image.
Globally, e-cigarette use has increased dramatically. Even though it is illegal to sell vape devices to minors, teenage vaping is rife in Canada, where vaping was legalised in 2018. Other attempts, such restricting advertising in public areas and retail locations, have likewise not succeeded. Between 2017 and 2021, the number of vapers increased by almost 120%, and 30% of youngsters say they have tried vaping. Although vaping is more common among teenagers than adults, little is known about their experiences and how they deal with this widespread problem.

Reducing the prevalence of vaping among teenagers and adolescents is a critical public health concern since there is growing evidence that e-cigarette usage may have negative effects on the cardiovascular system as well as impair impulse control, focus, and memory. Teens who vape run the risk of developing a dependence on nicotine and other addictive chemicals. In the future, they might switch from e-cigarettes to traditional cigarettes. Despite the fact that Canadian hospitals have recorded at least 20 cases of lung ailments linked to vaping, a large number of youth still think that vaping is less dangerous than smoking cigarettes.

Developing successful treatments via personal experience
Youth-focused efforts to quit smoking and using drugs have a long history of failing. Public health interventions should be focused on the lives and experiences of the people they are intended for in order to be meaningful and effective. The main investigators of the current study employed an atypical approach by enlisting teens as co-researchers in order to produce qualitative data regarding the ways in which teenagers—both vaping and non-vaping—are exposed to vaping in diverse social and environmental contexts.

The Human Environments Analysis Laboratory Youth Advisory Council (HEALYAC), located at Western University in Ontario, Canada, was the organisation that carried out the experiment. The goal of this project was to address issues that young people felt were significant; HEALYAC members raised the concern of vaping as a health risk. Seventeen of the seventeen and eighteen members of HEALYAC were added as co-authors of the publication and co-researchers of the Teens Talk Vaping project.

The student co-researchers received ethics and qualitative research methodology training from adult investigators. The co-researchers then held focus group discussions (FGD) with Canadian-residing high school students, ages 13 to 19. Every participant in the focus group had previously completed an online survey and shown interest in participating in an online focus group. Seven focus groups had a total of 17 individuals, seven of whom identified as male and the remaining 10 as female. Of the attendees, just three had ever vaporised. Using qualitative analysis methods, their answers were examined, and themes emerged.

Bathrooms as a potential vaping exposure source
Despite not vaping themselves, a number of students talked about how they were exposed to e-cigarette use in the classroom. They talked about the “cotton candy and lemon fog” that pervaded the restrooms. The potential health repercussions of passive vapour exposure worried some people. Others were concerned that even though they weren’t vaping, teachers could believe they were.

Some students avoided using the restrooms when vapers were about since they felt “out of place” if they did not engage in the practise. Students discussed how teachers had invaded their privacy by removing the doors to the boys’ lavatory in an effort to deter vaping in two focus group discussions. Students nevertheless found other locations to vape in spite of this, and some even developed “stealth” strategies that allowed them to vape in class without generating vapour.
Easy access and peer pressure
The FGD participants said that social media was “unavoidably” going to contain content related to vaping. These featured narratives and personal postings by teenagers sharing their experiences with others who followed them, as well as official ads and promotional articles. Influencers encouraged the normalisation of vaping practises by posting videos of themselves performing “tricks” on social media in the hopes of going viral. The students also talked about how some of the accounts they followed had attempted to sell them used vaping supplies.

A participant in the study who vaped disclosed that he initially attempted it because his friends were doing it. He was worried that if he didn’t participate, his peers would think poorly of him. Students who could execute more ‘tricks’ were admired, and older students frequently encouraged younger kids to join in the practise. Teen vapers no longer distinguished their habit from hanging out with buddies. Students found it simple to obtain vapes outside of social media. They may buy them from an older pupil, or they could pay their elder siblings to buy them.

focusing on preventing vaping among students
Some people’s access to vapes was restricted by the epidemic, but others turned to them more frequently as a coping mechanism for loneliness, stress, and worry. Students pointed out that one reason school-based preventive initiatives didn’t work was because they weren’t up to date. Pupils wanted data that was grounded in research to back up their decision to give up vaping, especially in regards to the long-term effects.

Future educational initiatives need to be “actively adapted, tailored, and responsive to the rapidly evolving youth vaping landscape” in order to be successful. However, the most significant outcome of the study may be that teens are open to discussing these topics. It’s time for grownups to pay attention.

Should you be encountering any of the problems discussed in this article, please do not hesitate to contact us, and we will try to assist you in any way we can. 

Contact us